Wednesday, July 31, 2013

DePuy Files Summary Judgment in California ASR Case


Johnson & Johnson, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. and their affiliated companies have moved for summary adjudication in an ASR hip implant case scheduled to be California’s first bellwether trial on October 1, 2013.

The Defendants filed their summary judgment motion in San Francisco Superior Court July 26. This was the deadline given by Judge Richard A. Kramer, who presides over the coordinated DePuy ASR hip cases in California.
 
The Plaintiff in the case is Robert Eugene Ottman. His opposition motion is due August 30. The judge has already scheduled a hearing on dispositive motions for September 13.
 
In related news, Judge Kramer has ruled that some plaintiffs who are in the consolidated action in California can add DePuy Pinnacle hip implant claims to their lawsuits. The ruling came as a result of a motion filed jointly by seven plaintiffs. DePuy recalled the metal-on-metal ASR in 2010, but has not yet recalled the metal-on-metal Pinnacle hip replacement system. All signs from the Defendants point to no recall in sight.
The two DePuy products have been under U.S. Food and Drug Administration scrutiny, primarily because of one dangerous alleged side effect called “metal poisoning,” or “metallosis.” According to the FDA, metal ions could peel off into the patient’s bloodstream when the device’s metal parts rub together. This could lead to potentially severe health problems such as tissue damage, necrosis and pseudo-tumors.
Our firm is currently investigating claims for those people who have been implanted with DePuy hip replacement devices, ASR, Pinnacle, and all other metal-on-metal hips. If you would like a free case evaluation, please contact Booth Samuels at toll free 1-866-515-8880 or at booths@pittmandutton.com.
 
 
 

 

Friday, July 19, 2013

6 Current NCAA Football Players Seek to Join O'Bannon Suit


It has been quite a week on the NCAA lawsuit front. A couple of major developments have occurred, coincidentally during the SEC Media days here in Birmingham. How all of this shakes out is yet to be determined, but the heat has obviously affected the NCAA.

The first major turn of events was that the NCAA is dropping all ties with EA Sports for one of the most popular and profitable video game of all time-NCAA College Football. The NCAA is letting their contract with EA Sports expire in June 2014 and will not be renewing it. The game is a major point of contention in the lawsuit. For more on that story, click on the link below:

http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2013/7/17/4532348/ncaa-ea-sports-ncaa-football

The second major development was that six current NCAA football players are seeking to join the O'Bannon lawsuit. The O'Bannon lawsuit started as only seeking to redress issues former athletes faced. Last year, the complaint was amended to include current players. Pittman, Dutton & Hellums, P.C., is actively involved in this lawsuit, representing former University of Alabama player Tyrone Prothro. Judge Wilken, the presiding judge over the suit, has yet to rule on the class certification issue. For more on this story, click on the link below:

http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/9491249/six-current-football-players-join-ed-obannon-ncaa-lawsuit

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

BP Trying to Suspend Claim Payments

Lawyers for British Petroleum have asked United States District Judge Barbier, who is presiding over the MDL, to suspend payments to claimants because of alleged fraud. Read the story below from The Times Picayune/nola.com:

http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2013/07/bp_asks_federal_court_to_suspe.html#incart_m-rpt-2